Kya Islam Ki Stories Bhi Mythology Hain?

OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Islam Ki Stories Bhi Mythology Hain?

Ek atheist/ex-Muslim ne objection uthaya ke Islam me bhi mythology jesi stories hain — jaise Meraj ka safar aur Ashab-e-Kahaf (jo 300 saal tak soye rahe). Uska kehna tha ke agar hum logic use karein, to ye cheezein science ke khilaaf lagti hain. Is base par usne Islam ke core beliefs ko mythological kahkar doubt karna shuru kiya.

SHORT ANSWER – Islam me Meraj aur Ashab e Kahaf SCIENCE ke khilaaf nahi, superior hain

Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya: Islam ke supernatural events myth nahi hote, balki unki base logical, philosophical aur metaphysical hoti hai. Meraj aur Ashab-e-Kahaf jaise waqiat impossible nahi, balki human logic ke beyond hain — aur inka base mythology nahi, divine revelation hai.

DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir ka logical jawab, point-by-point

Mufti Yasir ne objection ka jawab rational approach se diya:

  • Islam ki stories aur mythology me farq hai. Mythology ka base fabricated stories hota hai, jabke Islam me foundation Allah aur uske Rasool par belief hai.
  • Meraj aur Ashab-e-Kahaf ke events supernatural hain, lekin illogical nahi. Modern science bhi maan chuki hai ke waqt (time) ka perception har jagah ek jaisa nahi hota — atomic clocks aur relativity ka concept is baat ko support karta hai.
  • Quran aur Hadith me jo cheezein aayi hain, unka maqsad hidayat dena hai — har cheez laboratory se prove karna zaroori nahi.
  • Ek example ke zariye Mufti ne samjhaya ke agar insaf duniya me 100% nahi milta, to akhirat aur afterlife ka hona zaroori hai. Is base par Jannat aur Jahannam ka concept perfectly logical hai.

OBJECTION FLAWS – Atheist ke reasoning me logical galtiyan

  • Fallacy 1: Equating Myth with Revelation Atheist ne Meraj jese divine waqiye ko mythology se compare kiya, jo flawed analogy hai.
  • Fallacy 2: Scientific Ignorance of Time Dilation 300 saal ka sona (Ashab-e-Kahaf) ko impossible kehna galat hai jab science khud batati hai ke waqt har jaga ek jaisa nahi guzarta.
  • Fallacy 3: Limited Human Logic Expecting Unlimited Divine Acts to Fit It Har cheez ko human logic se prove karna chahna flawed hai. Agar khuda har cheez humare logic ke mutabiq kare, to wo insaan jaisa ho gaya.
  • Fallacy 4: Dismissing Faith-Based Epistemology Sirf lab-test wali knowledge ko ‘real’ maanna aur wahi se sab kuch measure karna ek flawed epistemological standard hai.
  • Fallacy 5: Ignoring the Role of Revelation in Spiritual Realities Spiritual aur metaphysical realities ko sirf duniya ke physics ke scale par measure karna valid nahi hota.

FINAL THOUGHTS – Faith aur Logic dono ka jawab ek hi hai: Revelation

Agar koi shakhs logic use karte hue Islam tak pahucha hai, to usse Islam ke andar ke concepts par bhi wahi logical consistency apply karni chahiye. Meraj aur Ashab-e-Kahaf jese waqiat hidayat ka zariya hain, not fairy tales. Jab tak hum khud ko limited samajhkar unlimited Creator ko maante nahi, tab tak humara doubt clear nahi hoga. Islam ka foundation revelation hai — aur wahi real logic bhi wahi se nikalta hai.

Share This Artical To…

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related articles