OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Buddhism Waqai Peaceful Religion Hai?
Athiest ne question uthaya ke Islam me agar koi religion ko insult kare to uska jawab kya hona chahiye. Is discussion ke beech me usne claim kiya ke Islam me zyada mob lynching hoti hai, jabke Buddhism ek peaceful religion hai. Mufti Yasir ne is per deeply respond kiya, aur historically Buddhist countries ke genocide aur violence ka data samne rakha – khaas taur par Myanmar (Rohingya genocide), Bangladesh (2012 attacks), aur Japan (WWII atrocities).
SHORT ANSWER – Buddhism ka Peaceful Label Ek Illusion Hai
Mufti Yasir ne point out kiya ke Buddhism ka peaceful image sirf perception hai, reality nahi. Myanmar me Buddhist army ne Rohingya Muslims ka genocide kiya, aur Japan ne WWII me mass killing ki thi – dono Buddhist-majority regions the. Islam me law ko haath me lena haram hai, jabke Buddhist regimes khud state-sponsored violence me involve hain.
DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir Ka Tareeni Response on Buddhist Violence
Mufti Yasir ne sabse pehle clarify kiya ke Islam kisi ko law haath me lene ki ijaazat nahi deta. Mob lynching chahe kisi bhi naam pe ho – wo Islamically haram hai. Iske baad Mufti sahab ne objector ke “Buddhism is peaceful” claim ko historical data ke zariye challenge kiya:
- 2012 Bangladesh incident: Buddhist ne Quran ke khilaaf fake profile banayi, jiske response me Muslim mobs ne Buddhist temples destroy kiye. Lekin yeh isolated event tha, jisme law ka lack tha.
- Rohingya genocide: Myanmar me Buddhist army ne mass killings ki – sirf is liye ke wo Muslims the, na ke koi blasphemy ya illegality thi. Objector ne isko illegal immigration ka issue banaya, lekin Mufti Yasir ne 18th century history se bataya ke Rohingyas wahan legally British era se reh rahe the.
- Japan (WWII): Mufti Yasir ne remind karwaya ke WWII me sabse zyada violent action Japan – ek Buddhist nation – ne kiya, including mass rape, bombing aur genocide.
Mufti Yasir ne yeh bhi clarify kiya ke Buddhism me koi divine law ya sin ka clear concept nahi hota, sirf “Buddha” ko honour kiya jata hai – is wajah se unke actions ka ethical basis weak hota hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Atheist Ka Claim Galat Kyun Tha?
- 1. Selective Perception Fallacy: Sirf Muslim incidents dekhna aur Buddhist violence ignore karna biased view hai.
- 2. False Comparison: Islam ke grassroots followers aur Buddhist state armies ka comparison fair nahi.
- 3. Historical Ignorance: Rohingya genocide ka background ignore karke illegal immigration kehna misleading hai.
- 4. Strawman Argument: Islam ko unjustifiably violent portray karna, jabke Quran aur Prophet ﷺ ke teachings clearly peace aur justice ke favor me hain.
- 5. Denial of Genocide: Objector Buddhist-led genocide ko political ya self-defense label karke justify karta hai, jo unethical hai.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Har Peaceful Chehra Zaroori Nahi Ke Asliyat Ho
Yeh debate hume yeh sikhati hai ke kisi bhi religion ko surface level image se judge karna khatarnaak ho sakta hai. Peace sirf slogans se nahi, ground reality se prove hoti hai. Mufti Yasir ne facts ke zariye expose kiya ke jahan Islam ko bina wajah blame kiya jata hai, wahan real-world Buddhist violence ka zikr tak nahi hota. Reader ko khud sochna chahiye – kya sirf silence aur smile se koi community peaceful sabit ho jati hai?
