OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Rasool ﷺ Ke Ahkaam Mahfooz Nahi Rahe, Isliye Unki Itta’at Ab Laazim Nahi?
Ek objector ne claim kiya ke Qur’an to mahfooz hai, lekin Rasool ﷺ ke ahkaam (hadith) mahfooz nahi rahe. Is liye Qur’an me likhe huye “Rasool ki ita’at” ke hukum ab hume apply nahi karne chahiye. Usne yeh bhi kaha ke kuch ayaat irrelevant ho chuki hain, aur hadith sirf us zamane ke logon ke liye thi – hamare liye nahi.
SHORT ANSWER – Rasool Ki Itta’at Ka Hukum Ab Bhi Laazim Hai
Mufti Yasir ne saaf jawab diya: Jab Qur’an me likha hai ke “Allah aur Rasool ke hukum ko maano,” to iska matlab hai ke Rasool ﷺ ke ahkaam bhi follow karna waajib hai. Agar yeh hukum sirf unke zamane tak restricted hota, to Qur’an me wo aayat rehti hi nahi. Rasool ﷺ ke kuch ahkaam tawaatur aur sahih sanad ke zariye ab tak safe hain – aur inhi se deen mukammal hota hai.
DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir Ka Jawab: Qur’an Aur Sunnah Dono Zaroori Hain
Mufti Yasir ne objector se directly kaha ke agar aap Qur’an ko follow karte ho, to usme “Ati’ullaha wa ati’ur Rasool” jaise ayaat bar bar aati hain. Iska matlab yeh hai ke Rasool ﷺ ke hukum bhi Qur’an ki tarah laazim hain. Agar Rasool ka hukum irrelevant hota, to Qur’an me uska zikr hi nahi hota.
Unhone misal di ke jaise agar kisi mulk ke law me likha ho ke “Commissioner ka hukum bhi maano,” to iska matlab hota hai ke Commissioner ko law-making authority mili hui hai. Bilkul aise hi, Rasool ﷺ ko Allah ne tashri’i (legislative) authority di thi.
Mufti Yasir ne yeh bhi clarify kiya ke hadith ki authenticity ek alag academic topic hai, lekin yeh kehna ke Rasool ﷺ ke hukum mahfooz hi nahi rahe – yeh Qur’an ke khilaf hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Munkir-e-Hadith Argument Me 6 Major Logical Errors
- 1. Self-Contradiction: Objector Qur’an ko maanta hai, lekin usi Qur’an ke hukum (Rasool ki ita’at) ka inkaar karta hai.
- 2. Selective Application: Sirf wahi ayaat “relevant” kehte hain jo unki soch se match karti hain – baaqi sab ko irrelevant declare kar dete hain.
- 3. Strawman Fallacy: Hadith me weakness ya riwayat ki discussion ko use karke pura hadith system reject karte hain – jo ke ilm e hadith ki approach nahi hai.
- 4. False Authority: Objector Qur’an ka reference deta hai, lekin usi Qur’an ke base par hadith ka inkaar karta hai – yeh contradictory position hai.
- 5. Confusing Preservation with Interpretation: Agar koi hukum mahfooz hai lekin samajhne me farq ho raha hai, to iska matlab yeh nahi ke wo hukum gayab ho gaya.
- 6. Appeal to Modernism: Western logical framework ko Islamic nass par impose karke inkar kiya ja raha hai – jo intellectually dishonest hai.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Qur’an Aur Rasool ﷺ Ek Saath Hi Samajh Aate Hain
Mufti Yasir ne end me yeh point rakha ke agar Qur’an hidayat hai, to Rasool ﷺ us hidayat ka zinda nizaam hain. Unki ahkaam mahfooz na hote to Qur’an me “Rasool ki ita’at” ka hukum hi nahi hota. Aaj bhi hume wahi ahkaam milte hain – sirf zarurat hai ke unhein samajhne ke liye ilm, niyyat, aur yaqeen ke saath padhai ki jaaye. Sirf critic banne se hidayat nahi milti – uske liye tasleem aur talib-e-haq banna padta hai.
