Aaj ka duniya har taraf se azaadi, insani huqooq, aur tolerance ke slogans se goonj raha hai. Magar jab kisi shakhs ko apne mazhab ke mutabiq jeene ka haq diya jaye to wahi so-call “liberal” tabqay uske khilaf khada ho jata hai. Yeh ek ajeeb si contradiction hai: jis ideology ka dawa tolerance ka hai, wo khud apni baat ko enforce karke doosri ideologies ko dabana chahti hai. To phir sawal uthta hai — kya secularism khud ek ideological kattarta ban gaya hai?
Is maqale me hum kuch ahem objections ka logical tajziya karenge, aur batayenge ke asal kattarta kis mein hai – Islam mein, ya us ideology mein jo sab ko ek hi nazariye par chalana chahti hai?
Table of Contents
Key Takeaways:
- Secularism bhi jab zabardasti thopa jaye, to woh khud kattarta ban jata hai.
- Freedom of expression har kisi ke liye barabar nahi hoti — system sensitive topics par limitations lagata hai.
- Uniform Civil Code ka nafaz personal religious rights ko nuqsan pohcha sakta hai.
- Jizyah aur “Zimmi” ka concept modern resident alien systems se mutabiqat rakhta hai.
- Har ideology ke apne red lines hotay hain, un par khilaf warzi har mulk me saza ka sabab hota hai.
Kya Sab Ko Ek System Par Chalana Hi Tolerance Hai?
Secular ideologues ka daawa hota hai:
“Sab ko ek uniform system me lana hi insaaf hai — koi alag rule nahi hona chahiye.”
Yeh approach sun’ne me neutral lagti hai, lekin asal me yeh “enforced uniformity” ka naam hai — jisme har shakhs ko uske personal belief system se door le ja kar ek naya social contract accept karne par majboor kiya jata hai. Is se sirf ek elite system ko faida hota hai, na ke aam insaan ko.
Muslim community agar apne personal laws par amal karti hai (nikah, talaaq, virasat), to usse secularism ke khilaaf samjha jata hai. Yeh ek “False Dilemma” fallacy hai — ya to secular bano, ya backward! Aise categorization society me division paida karta hai, tolerance nahi.
Kya Uniform Civil Code Religious Freedom Ko Khatm Kar Deta Hai?
Uniform Civil Code ka idea yeh hai ke sab citizens ek jaise civil law ke tahat ayen, regardless of their religion.
Lekin isme problem yeh hai:
- Har mazhab ke apne family laws hote hain, jo unke aqeede se juday hotay hain.
- UCC in laws ko nullify karta hai, is ka matlab hai: kisi shakhs ke liye apne mazhab ke mutabiq amal karna mushkil ya ghair-qanooni ban jayega.
Agar kisi Hindu ko kaha jaye ke ab tumhara vivaah Islam ke nikah jaisa mana jayega — to kya wo isay qabool karega?
Aise system me sab ko ek rang me rangne ki koshish hoti hai — lekin yeh approach hi diversity ke khilaaf hai. Yeh “Cultural Imperialism” fallacy hai — jisme apne nazariye ko superior samajh kar sab par thop diya jata hai.
Azaadi-e-Rai Ki Haqeeqat: Sirf Ek Khwab?
Jo log secularism ko azaadi ka paigham kehte hain, wo aksar bhool jate hain ke har azaadi ke saath limitations hoti hain.
India me freedom of speech hai, magar:
- Aap desh ke khilaaf baat nahi kar sakte.
- Desh ke dushman ka jhanda lehrana aapko jail tak le ja sakta hai.
- Kisi community ke khilaaf kuch kahna “hate speech” ban jata hai.
Yani freedom hai, lekin conditional. To agar Islam ke kisi hukm ke khilaf baat karna allowed nahi, to secular societies me bhi aise red lines exist karti hain. Is se sabit hota hai ke koi bhi system absolute freedom nahi deta. Har system me sensitive zones hote hain. Farq sirf unki priorities ka hota hai.
Kya Kafir Islami Riyasat Me Reh Sakte Hain?
Ek aur common objection uthta hai: “Islam me agar koi kafir hai to usko to maar diya jata hai ya nikala jata hai.”
Ye “Strawman Fallacy” hai. Islam me kafir ke liye mukhtalif ahkaam hain — lekin sab ek jaise nahi. Islam me:
- Zimmi ka concept hai — yaani wo non-Muslim jo Islami riyasat me aman se rehta hai.
- Usse protection milti hai, apne deen par amal ka haq milta hai, aur sirf Jizyah ke naam se ek nominal tax deta hai — jo actually security service ka badla hota hai.
- Zimmi ko kisi mazahbi majboori ke tahat Muslim nahi banaya jata.
Yeh exactly wohi system hai jo aaj ke modern mulkon me “Resident Alien” ya “Permanent Resident” ke roop me maujood hai — jahan voting rights aur kuch privileges limited hote hain magar protection milti hai.
Kya Zimmi Lafz Tazleel Hai?
Kuch log keh dete hain ke “Zimmi” lafz derogatory hai, ya tauheen ka pehlu rakhta hai.
Asal me “Zimmi” ka matlab hai:
“Zimma lena” — yaani zimmedari lena.
Isme tauheen nahi, balke protection aur huqooq ki guarantee chhupi hoti hai. Jaise:
- Aaj bhi modern states kuch logon ko “Green Card Holder”, “Resident Alien” kehte hain — kya ye tauheen hai?
- Inko sirf kuch specific rights nahi milte — baaki tamam protections di jati hain.
Aise hi Islami nizam me bhi Zimmi ko unka mazahbi, shakhsi, aur madni haq diya jata hai — bas hukumran unko govern karta hai ek mutual agreement ke zariye.
Kya Secularism Ko Thopna Bhi Kattarta Hai?
Agar koi shakhs secularism ko sabse behtareen system samajhta hai to yeh uska personal choice hai.
Lekin agar woh:
- Isay sab pe enforce kare,
- Religious minorities ke personal law khatam kar de,
- Shari’ah system ko allow na kare,
To yeh bhi ek “Authoritarian Secularism” ban jata hai.
Jis tarah kisi ko Islam zabardasti manwana zulm hai, usi tarah kisi ko secularism manwana bhi uski azaadi ka qatal hai.
Conclusion
Aakhir me hum yeh samajh chuke hain ke kattarta sirf ek religious phenomenon nahi — secularism me bhi jab apna nazariya force kiya jaye, to woh bhi kattarta ban jata hai. Islam kisi par deen nahi thopta — “La ikraha fid-deen” ka usool hai. Magar agar ek Muslim society apne aqeede aur nizam par amal karna chahe to usay bhi waise hi tolerance milni chahiye jaise secular societies ke citizens ko milti hai.
Duniya me asli tolerance wahi hai jo mukhtalif nazariyat ko accept kare, unhe unki jagah de, aur zabardasti kisi ko ek he system me dhakelne ki koshish na kare.
FAQs
Q: Kya secularism sab religions ke liye neutral hota hai?
A: Ideal secularism neutral hota hai, lekin jab wo kisi religion ke personal law ko khatam karta hai, to uska neutrality claim doubtful ho jata hai.
Q: Kya Muslim personal law India ke constitution se takraata hai?
A: Nahi, Indian constitution religious freedom allow karta hai, isliye personal laws ko bhi constitutional protection milti hai.
Q: Kya Islam non-Muslims ko Islami riyasat me rehne deta hai?
A: Ji haan, Islam me Zimmi system ke zariye non-Muslims ko protection, religious freedom, aur huqooq diye jate hain.
Q: Kya Zimmi ka matlab “doosre darje ka shehri” hai?
A: Nahi, Zimmi ka matlab hai “protected subject.” Iska system modern “Resident Alien” se milta julta hai — tauheen nahi, zimmedari aur protection ka izhar hai.
Q: Kya Uniform Civil Code sab ke liye insaaf hai?
A: Har shakhs ke liye ek system enforce karna insaaf nahi, jab tak wo uski beliefs ke khilaaf na ho. True insaaf choice aur tolerance me hai.
