OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Quran Abbasid Caliphate Ne Gadh Kar Banaya Tha?
Ek atheist ne claim kiya ke Quran Abbasid daur (8th century CE ke baad) me likha gaya tha. Uske mutabiq kuch log Kufa ke aaspaas ke pahadon me baithe aur wahan Quran compose kiya. Yeh idea basically Quran ko divine revelation nahi, balki political fabrication batata hai. Usne yeh bhi suggest kiya ke Quran ke andar jagahon ke references ya historical indicators nahi milte, is liye yeh text later era ka invention ho sakta hai.
SHORT ANSWER – Kya Quran ki asaliyat sirf Abbasid daur me shuru hui thi?
Bilkul nahi. Mufti Yasir ne saaf kaha ke Quran ka asli source tawatur (mass transmission) hai, na ke koi physical manuscript. Agar Quran Abbasid era me likha gaya hota, to us waqt ki baqi Islamic powers (Spain, Egypt, Syria) isay reject kar deti. Lekin aisa kabhi nahi hua. Har jagah ek hi Quran padha gaya, jo iska historical consistency ka saboot hai.
DETAILED ANSWER – Abbasid daur me Quran likhe jaane ke claim ka logical jawab
Mufti Yasir ne multiple points me is objection ko refute kiya:
- Quran ka asal source koi ek manuscript nahi, balki tawatur hai – yani hazaron logon ka ek hi text ko preserve karna, jisme jhoot ka imkaan nahi.
- Agar Quran Abbasid era me likha gaya hota, to us waqt ki dusri political powers – jaise Umayyads in Spain, Fatimids in Egypt – is Quran ko reject karte. Lekin sab ne same Quran accept kiya.
- Mufti Yasir ne bataya ke agar Quran ko modify karna ya jhoota gadhna itna aasan hota, to baad ke Muslim sultans (Mughals, Ottomans) bhi naye surahs daal dete – lekin kisi ne nahi kiya.
- Quran ki consistency ko Imam Abu Hanifa ke students, Imam Muhammad aur Imam Awzai ke disagreements ke zariye bhi verify kiya gaya. Agar gadhawat hoti, to yeh log expose kar dete.
- Jo log Quran me jagahon ka zikar kam hone ki baat karte hain, unko yeh samajhna chahiye ke Quran ka focus moral aur spiritual guidance par hai, na ke tourist guide banne par.
OBJECTION FLAWS – “Abbasid ne Quran likha” wale claim ke major logical faults
1. No Historical Rejection by Other Empires:
Agar Quran Abbasid invention hota, to Spain aur Egypt ke Muslim rulers isko reject karte – lekin aisa kabhi nahi hua.
2. Mass Transmission Ignored:
Objector Quran ke oral transmission (tawatur) ko ignore karta hai, jo strongest historical method hai.
3. False Assumption of Author Control:
Yeh maanna ke kisi ek group ne Quran likha aur puri duniya ne bina objection accept kar liya – yeh unrealistic hai.
4. Political Rivalry Neglected:
Umayyads aur Abbasids political enemies the. Agar Abbasids ne Quran badla hota, Umayyads sabse pehle expose karte.
5. Absurd Analogies:
Objector ne joke-style reasoning use ki (“Surah Baqarah Mughalon ne Eid ke liye banai”) – jo scholarly dialogue ke laayak hi nahi.
6. Inconsistent Criteria for Truth:
Ek taraf wo physical manuscript maangta hai, doosri taraf oral record ko “prone to error” kehkar reject karta hai – jabke oral transmission zyada reliable hoti hai pre-printing eras me.
7. Misunderstanding of Quranic Geography:
Quran me jagahon ka kam zikar uske divine focus ko show karta hai – location-based data Quran ka objective hi nahi.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Quran Par Jhoot Gadhne Ki Koshish Nayi Nahi Hai
Jab kisi kitab ke millionon hafiz ho aur 1400 saal se har generation usay same tarike se sunata aaye, to us par “late fabrication” ka ilzam sirf ignorance nahi, bad niyyat ka saboot bhi hai. Mufti Yasir ne har angle se yeh sabit kiya ke Quran sirf divine revelation hi nahi, balki logically bhi unforgeable hai. Abbasid theory sirf ek failed attempt hai Islam ke sabse strong pillar ko hilaane ki – lekin har dafa ki tarah, is baar bhi logic ne usay expose kar diya.
