Kya Quran Ko Constitution Se Upar Rakhna Ghalat Hai? – SHORT Me Jawab
Short Answer
Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya: Constitution ek human-made document hai, jabke Quran Creator ka kalam hai. Quran errorless hai, Constitution me error ka chance hota hai. Isliye Quran ko priority dena logical bhi hai aur constitutional bhi — kyunki Constitution khud har kisi ko apne deen par chalne ki freedom deta hai.
Quran Aur Constitution Ka Muqabla – Detailed Jawab by Mufti Yasir
Detailed Answer
Mufti Yasir ne mukammal reasoning ke sath bataya:
- Quran Allah ka kalam hai, jo errorless hai, timeless hai, aur har daur ke liye relevant hai.
- Constitution insaanon ka likha hua hai, jo badalne wala hai, aur kai baar amend bhi ho chuka hai. Isme error ho sakta hai.
- Constitution aur Quran ka muqabla apples aur oranges jaisa hai. Dono alag domains me kaam karte hain.
- Constitution kisi bhi citizen ko apne religious text ko follow karne ki ijazat deta hai. Isliye Muslim agar Quran ko follow karte hain, to wo Constitution ke against nahi ja rahe — balke usi ke right ka use kar rahe hote hain.
- Ambedkar khud bhi kisi na kisi religion ko maante the, tabhi unhone religious freedom ka principle diya. Agar koi khud religion ko nahi maanta, to wo bhi Constitution ke protection me hi safe hai.
- Constitution ki izzat apni jagah, lekin usay holy kehna ya Quran se upar rakhna logically sahi nahi hai — kyunki uska source divine nahi, human hai.
Objection Me Logical Flaws – Ghaltiyan Jo Nazar Andaz Ki Gayi
Objection Flaws
- False Equivalence
– Constitution (man-made) aur Quran (God-given) ka comparison logic ke khilaf hai. - Appeal to Emotion
– Constitution ko “sacred” feel ke sath present karke emotional angle use kiya gaya, jabke discussion rational hona chahiye. - Ignoring Freedom Principle
– Constitution khud religious freedom deta hai. Quran ko priority dena usi principle ka exercise hai. - Strawman Argument
– Muslim community par aise blame lagaye gaye jaise wo Constitution ko reject karti ho, jabke unka sirf Quran ko religious guide banana concern hai. - Selective Memory
– Objector ne historical facts (like Muslim support to Ambedkar’s election) ignore kiye, jabke unki relevance bahut strong thi. - Guilt by Association
– Kisi ek Muslim ke galat act (jaise stone-pelting) ko puri community ke against use kiya gaya — jo unfair generalization hai. - Hypocrisy Exposure Ignored
– Brahminical forces jo Constitution ko hi badalna chahti hain (Manusmriti wapas lana), unka zikr avoid kiya gaya jabke wo real threat hain.
Quran Ya Constitution – Sochne Ki Baat
Final Thoughts
Quran aur Constitution ke darmiyan clash tabhi hota hai jab log Constitution ko religious ya absolute document samajhne lagte hain. Islam Constitution ki izzat karta hai, lekin Quran ko sabse ooncha maanta hai — aur Constitution is baat ki ijazat khud deta hai. Quran ko priority dena na sirf logical hai, balke legal bhi. Yeh kisi ki tauheen nahi, ek Muslim ki faith ki reflection hai — jise Constitution protect karta hai.
