Kya Constitution Insaan Ke Liye Best Law Hai?
Ek objector ne claim kiya ke uska kisi bhi religion me belief nahi hai, lekin wo Constitution ko maanta hai — kyunki usme “humanity ka bhala” hai. Jab usse poocha gaya ke agar Afghanistan ka Constitution bhi humanity ke liye achha ho to kya use bhi maanega, to usne kaha haan — jab tak kisi ko problem nahi ho.
Is conversation me wo baar-baar law aur justice ko sirf equal treatmentl,
aur humanitarian value se judge kar raha tha.
Usne Indian reservation system, caste-based benefits aur presidential immunity ko unequal kehkar criticize kiya.
Lekin wo bhool gaya ke Constitution bhi kisi ek human ne nahi banaya — wo bhi ek limited human effort hai, jo time, power aur politics ke mutabiq change hota rehta hai.
SHORT ANSWER –
Constitution ya Justice ka asli mool kya hai?
Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya ke Constitution ek evolving social contract hai, lekin insaan har dafa sahi decision nahi le sakta. Agar insani logic hi ultimate hoti, to har mulk ka Constitution same hota. Justice ka real standard wahi ho sakta hai jo biased na ho — aur wo sirf Allah ka system de sakta hai.
DETAILED ANSWER – Constitution ki logic-based worship?
Mufti Yasir ne point kiya ke log Constitution ko blindly follow karte hain. bina samjhe ke unka base kya hai.
Jo objector hai, wo bhi Indian Constitution ke kisi article ko define nahi kar paaya.
sirf ye kehkar maan raha tha ke “ye humanity ke liye hai.”
Lekin jab usse Afghanistan jese dusre mulkon ke Constitution ke bare me poocha gaya, to usne wahi logic use ki — jab tak harm na ho, sab theek hai.
Mufti Yasir ne bataya ke ye utilitarian logic dangerous hai —
kyunki harm ka definition har kisi ka alag hota hai.
Kya tum kisi chhoti caste ke liye reservation doge ya sabko same treat karoge? Kya President jese log law se upar hone chahiye?
Islam me justice ka matlab hai: har insaan ko unka haq dena, na zyada, na kam — aur yahi balance system sirf wahi laa sakta hai jo har cheez ko janta hai — yaani Allah.
Objector ne kaha ke jo bhi cheez humanity ke liye achhi ho, wo use follow karega. Lekin “achha” ka standard har kisi ka alag hota hai. Kisi ke liye hijab oppression hai, kisi ke liye dignity. To phir kaun decide karega ke kya achha hai?
Mufti ne bataya ke har Constitution kisi author ne banaya hota hai, aur religion ka author Allah hai. Dono me rules, restrictions aur framework hota hai. Agar President ko immunity mil sakti hai law me, to Prophet ya Allah ko authority kyun nahi?
Jab tum Constitution me hierarchy accept karte ho, lekin religion me nahi, to tumhara standard biased hai. Jo logic tum legal system pe apply karte ho, wo deen pe bhi apply hona chahiye.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Constitution ke blind follow me kya kya fallacy thi?
- Fallacy 1: Self-Contradiction
- Objector khud kehta hai ke kisi belief system me uska yaqeen nahi, lekin Constitution ko blindly follow karta hai — bina samjhe ke wo kya kehta hai.
- Fallacy 2: Shifting Standards
- Kisi bhi Constitution ko valid kehta hai jab tak “harm” na ho — lekin harm ka standard kya hai, ye define nahi karta.
- Fallacy 3: Selective Equality
- Objector caste-based reservation ko unequal kehta hai, lekin jab baat President ki immunity par aayi to logic se hat gaya.
- Fallacy 4: Circular Logic
- Wo kehta hai ke law sirf is liye sahi hai kyunki Constitution me likha hai — aur Constitution is liye sahi hai kyunki wo law banata hai.
- Fallacy 5: Human Authority Over Divine Truth
- Insani Constitution ko final justice ka scale banana — jise insaan ne hi banaya ho — ye flawed source of truth hai.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Har bar Equal ka matlab Justice nahi hota
Insaan ke banaye hue system kabhi perfect nahi ho sakte.
Har Constitution limited logon ke experiences aur biases ka result hota hai.
Agar har mulk ka law alag hai, to kya justice bhi relative hai?
Islam ke hisaab se justice ka matlab ye nahi ke sabko same treat karo — balki ye ke har insaan ko uska haq do, jaise wo deserve karta hai. Sirf wahi system perfect ho sakta hai jisme na bias ho, na politics — aur wo sirf wahi de sakta hai jo sab kuch jaanta hai: Allah.
