OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Agar Khuda kuch karta hi nahi, to pehchana kaise?
Is debate me ek Sanatani objector (Mehta ji) ne claim kiya:
“Jo God hai, wo kuch karta hi nahi. Na usne duniya banayi, na koi karm kiya. Phir bhi wo God hai. Aur agar aap kehte ho ke God ne duniya banayi, to mujhe yeh batao — usse pehchana kaise?”
Sawal yeh tha ke agar God passive hai, kuch nahi karta, to uska proof kya hai?
Aur agar koi God active hai (jaise Qur’an ke Allah), to uska saboot kya hai?
SHORT ANSWER – Agar khuda ko pehchana nahi ja sakta, to us par yaqeen bhi nahi ban sakta
Mufti Yasir ne jawab diya:
“Jo cheez na duniya banaye, na communicate kare, na kuch kare – usay khuda kehna be-ma’ani hai. Aur jo cheez ‘absolute nothing’ se duniya banaye, uske liye reasoning chhod kar blind faith lena – irrational hai.”
DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir ne kaise expose kiya “passive God” ke theory ko?
- Passive God ka contradiction:
Objector ka kehna tha ke “God ne kuch nahi banaya, kuch nahi kiya, phir bhi God hai.”
Mufti ne poocha: “Agar God kuch karta hi nahi, to aapne usay pehchana kaise? Aur kyun maana ke wo hai bhi?” - Scriptures reject kiye, lekin alternative bhi vague:
Objector ne kaha ke “Saare dharmik granth manav rachit hain.”
Phir Mufti ne poocha: “Agar koi divine source nahi hai, to aapka source kya hai? Sirf ‘main mehsoos karta hoon’?” - Creation se God ka inkari claim:
Jab objector ne kaha ke “God ne duniya banayi hi nahi,”
Mufti ne reason-based logic apply kiya:- Agar universe hai, to aya kahan se?
- Agar aap kehte ho “absolute nothing” se bana, to ye biggest logical flaw hai — kyun ke nothing kabhi kuch produce nahi karti.
- Mehta ji ka jawab tha:
“Absolute nothing se positive-negative energy nikalti hai.”
Mufti ne point kiya: “Phir wo ‘nothing’ nahi hai, wo kuch hai — jisme se energy nikal rahi hai. Toh aapki theory collapse ho gayi.” - Catch-22 exposed:
Mufti ne clearly dikhaya ke agar objector kahe “koi reason nahi tha”, to existence ka reason nahi banega.
Aur agar kahe “reason tha”, to wo God ka alternative ban jayega — jis se objector khud bhag raha hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Logical flaws jo is objection me baar baar dikhayi diye:
1. Self-Defeating Definition
Aisa God jo kuch karta hi nahi — uska hona ya na hona farq nahi karta. That’s not God, that’s just a name.
2. Rejection without Replacement
Scriptures reject kar diye, lekin koi rational ya documented source nahi diya.
3. Equivocation Fallacy
“Absolute nothing” ko kabhi “energy” bolna, kabhi “potential” banana — contradiction hai.
4. False Humility
“Hum to samajh hi nahi sakte” kehkar reasoning se escape karna, debate ka substitute nahi ho sakta.
5. Circular Reasoning
“I know God is real because I feel it” — lekin feeling ka proof fir se wahi God ban jata hai.
6. Burden Shift
Sawal to objector ne uthaya tha, lekin jawab Mufti se expect kiya bina apna explanation diye.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Jab logic thak jaye, to mazaak start hota hai
Mufti Yasir ne calm, focused reasoning ke zariye ek complex objection ko step-by-step dismantle kiya. Jab objector ne multiple times answer dene se bachne ke liye sarcasm aur distraction ka sahara liya, to Mufti ne point-by-point evidence ke sath sabit kiya:
“Jo khuda kuch nahi karta, wo khuda nahi hota.”
“Aur jo universe ko ‘absolute nothing’ se samjhta hai, wo logic se nahi, confusion se soch raha hai.”