Kya Chote “Private Part” Wala Aadmi “Imam” Ban Sakta Hai?

Aaj kal ek viral video ne social media par logon ke zehan me confusion paida kar diya hai jahan ek fiqhi kitaab ke ek jumle ka mazmoon se kata hua matlab le kar Islam par tanqeed ki gayi. Video banane wale ne “Dur al-Mukhtar” ke ek excerpt ko highlight kiya hai jahan unka daawa hai ke “jiska private part chhota ho, wo imamat ka zyada haqdar hai.” Yeh baat na sirf misleading hai, balke poori Islamic fiqh ke maqasid aur tarteeb ka khilaaf hai.

Is article me hum logical, textual, aur shar’i daleel ke saath batayenge ke asal context kya tha, kis tarah ghalatfahmi hui, aur Islam ka asal position kya hai.

Key Takeaways:

• Islamic jurisprudence books insanon ki likhi hoti hain, aur unki har baat ko final hukm nahi samjha jata.
• Sahil ne “Dur al-Mukhtar” ka text context se kaat kar misuse kiya.
• Imamat ke haqdar banne ka scale Quran o Hadith se tay hota hai, kisi private part ki size se nahi.
• Fiqhi texts ka meaning sirf matn (main text) se nahi, balkay uske sharh (commentary) se samjha jata hai.
• Islam me academic honesty ka matlab ye hai ke galat baat ko chhupaya nahi jata, balke openly reject kiya jata hai.

Objection: Kya Fiqh me “Chhota Private Part Wala” Imam Banega?

Objection: Sahil ne ek viral video me claim kiya ke “Dur al-Mukhtar” me likha hai ke jiska private part chhota ho, wo imamat ka zyada mustahiq hai. Is ka matlab unhone yeh liya ke Islam jism ki chhoti shape ko imamat ka scale manta hai.

Context ki Tashreeh

Dur al-Mukhtar fiqh ki ek mashhoor kitaab hai jise Radd al-Mukhtar (Shami) ke sharh ke saath padha jata hai. Us matn (main text) me ek jumla aata hai:

“Agar log imamat ke liye ikhtilaf karein to pehle wo imam banega jo Islam me sabse pehle aaya. Phir jo sabse zyada Quran janta ho… phir uska sar bara ho… phir jiska private part chhota ho.”

Yahan sahil ne sirf ek phrase ko nikal kar viral kar diya: “jiska private part chhota ho.” Jabke niche commentary me clear hai ke yeh aza se murad sirf ek specific body part nahi, balke general body proportions hain — jiska sar disproportionally bara ho aur haath-pair chhote ho, to uski appearance aur cognitive symmetry behtar hoti hai.

Logical Fallacy: Strawman Argument

Sahil ka poora objection ek Strawman Fallacy hai — yani kisi baat ko twist karke Islam par ilzaam lagana. Usne text ka context nahi diya, sharh nahi padhi, aur classical Islamic methodology ko ignore kiya.

Islamic Stance: Imamat Ka Haqdar Kaun?

Islam ne imamat ke liye jo criteria diya hai wo bilkul wazeh hai:

1. Quran Ki Ilmiyat: Jis shakhs ko Quran zyada yaad ho, wo imam banega (Hadith)
2. Sunnat Ki Samajh: Agar hifz barabar ho to jo sunnat ka behtar ilm rakhta ho
3. Akhlaq & Taqwa: Imamat ka asli maqasid guidance aur akhlaqi leadership hai, na ke physical attributes

Kisi private part ke chhote ya bare hone ka imamat se koi ta’alluq nahi.

Fiqhi Texts Insani Likhi Hoti Hain, Wahy Nahi

Mufti sahab ne barah-e-raast kaha ke fiqh ki kitaabein “Farishte nahi, insano ne likhi hain.” Quran aur Hadith ke muqablay me ye texts fallible hain. Isi liye, ummat ne hamisha sirf un baaton ko qubool kiya jo Qurani manhaj se match karti hain, aur baaqi ko “deewar par maar diya.”

Yeh intellectual honesty hai — koi baat agar ghalat likhi gayi ho to usko openly reject kar diya jata hai, chhupaya nahi jata.

Misal: Tafsir, Hadith aur Fiqh Me Critical Approach

Tafsir books, fiqh manuals, ya hadith collections me kai aisi riwayaat hoti hain jo authentic nahi hoti. Scholars unhein test karte hain — agar kisi tafsir me koi ghalat baat ho, to ummat usse reject kar deti hai.

Aaj ke log agar is critical process ko samjhe bagair ek phrase par tanqeed karte hain, to wo na sirf apne jahalat ka izhar karte hain balke logon ko gumrah bhi karte hain.

Conclusion

Is puray issue ka nateeja ye hai ke ek viral video ke zariye Islam par jhoota ilzaam lagaya gaya, jisme na context tha, na sharh ka hawala, na scholarly honesty. Islam ne imamat ke clear standards diye hain — knowledge, piety, Quran understanding — kisi private part ki size se iska koi ta’alluq nahi.

Hum sab ki zimmedari hai ke viral cheezon ka sachai ke scale par tajziya karein aur sirf viral clips nahi, asal ilm aur hawale padhein.

FAQs

Q: Kya Dur al-Mukhtar Islam ka final source hai?
A: Nahi. Islam ka final source sirf Quran aur Sahih Hadith hain. Dur al-Mukhtar fiqh ki ek insani kitab hai jise scholars verify karte hain.

Q: Kya kisi private part ke basis par imamat ka faisla hota hai?
A: Bilkul nahi. Islam ne imamat ka scale hifz, ilm aur akhlaq ko banaya hai, na ke physical shape ko.

Q: Agar kisi kitab me ghalat baat likhi ho to uska kya kiya jata hai?
A: Usay openly reject kiya jata hai. Islam me sachai ko chhupane ka culture nahi hai, balkay dialogue aur correction ka rivaaj hai.

Q: Kya Sahil ka objection Islamic view ke khilaaf hai?
A: Haan. Unhone text ka galat matlab nikala aur Islam par ilzam lagaya. Yeh ek clear misrepresentation hai.