OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya koi banda sirf apne spiritual experience se Prophet ban sakta hai?
Ek non-Muslim ne apne aap ko “Prophet” kaha aur claim kiya ke usne khuda ko dekha hai, usse baat ki hai, aur wo ab logon ko guide karne ke liye bheja gaya hai. Usne kaha ke agar kisi ko 40 din de diye jayein to wo bhi khuda ko dekh sakta hai. Uske claims mein contradictions bhi thein — kabhi wo kehta hai khuda time-bound hai, kabhi kehta hai timeless hai. Is par Mufti Yasir ne logical aur theological tareeqe se jawaab diya.
SHORT ANSWER – Fake Prophet ka claim sirf feeling ya observation par base nahi ho sakta
Agar har koi sirf apne spiritual experience ki buniyad par Prophet ban jaye to phir deen, law aur justice ka poora system collapse ho jata. Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya ke Prophet hone ke liye Allah ka officially appointed hona zaroori hai — sirf personal claim se nahi hota.
DETAILED ANSWER – Spiritual observation ka misuse aur Mufti Yasir ka logical dismantle
Mufti Yasir ne sabse pehle ye point uthaya ke agar tum Prophet ho to tumhara ilm sabse zyada hona chahiye — phir tum dusron se sawaal kyun kar rahe ho? Jo Allah se directly baat kar sakta hai, usse kisi insan se guidance ki zarurat hi nahi.
Jab fake Prophet ne kaha ke usne Allah ko dekha hai, aur uski description di ke woh ek chamakta noor hai jisme haath pair hain, Mufti Yasir ne turant point out kiya ke yeh tasveer Quran aur Hadith ke khilaf hai — Islam ke mutabiq Allah ki koi surat nahi hai, na hi woh kisi jism mein hai.
Fake Prophet ke claims mein contradictions bhi thein: pehle woh kehta hai Allah time-bound hai, phir kehta hai timeless. Ye logical contradiction Mufti Yasir ne highlight kiya: jo entity timeless hai usko ek limited, time-bound insan ka dekh lena kaise mumkin hai?
Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya ke agar koi Prophet hone ka claim karta hai to uske paas wahy (divine revelation), miracles aur Allah ki taraf se clear verification hona chahiye. Sirf koi feel kare ya observe kare — ye Islam ke nabuwwat ke concept ke khilaf hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Is claim ke logical aur spiritual contradictions
- Fallacy 1: Subjective Experience = Universal Truth Sirf apni personal feeling ya dekhne ka dawa sabit nahi karta ke wo universal reality hai. Yeh logical flaw hai.
- Fallacy 2: Time-bound insaan ne Time-less Allah ko observe kar liya? Jab Allah har had se pare hai, to ek limited being usko kaise fully observe kar sakti hai?
- Fallacy 3: Contradiction in claims Ek waqt mein Allah ko time-bound kehna, aur agle moment mein timeless — ye contradictory reasoning hai.
- Fallacy 4: Prophethood without divine appointment Quran ke mutabiq Nabuwat Allah ki taraf se hoti hai, khud se announce nahi ki ja sakti.
- Fallacy 5: No external validation Agar har shakhs bas apne spiritual vision se Prophet banne lage, to har claim sahi ya galat kaise judge hoga?
FINAL THOUGHTS – Deen ek system hai, na ke personal fantasy ka naam
Mufti Yasir ne is fake Prophet ka narrative expose karke ye bataya ke agar spiritual observation ka misuse hone lage to duniya mein chaos aa jayega. Har banda agar khud ko Prophet kahne lage sirf isliye ke usne kuch mehsoos kiya — to na deen safe rahega, na society. Islam mein Prophet wahi hota hai jo Allah ki taraf se confirm kiya gaya ho — with wahi, miracles, aur divine guidance. Baqi sab claims sirf illusion ya manipulation ho sakte hain.
