OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Muslims bhi churches par attack karte hain? Islam ka kya stance hai?
Ek objection yeh uthta hai ke agar Muslims sach me peace aur justice ke supporter hain to phir Pakistan me churches par hamle kyu hote hain? Aur agar India me Hindu mobs churches ya mosques ko nuksaan pahuchate hain to kya Pakistan me Muslims bhi wahi kar rahe hain? Kya Islam isko support karta hai? Aur kya Mufti Yasir ne Pakistan ke cases me double standards dikhaye?
SHORT ANSWER – Islam har jagah injustice condemn karta hai, chahe wo India ho ya Pakistan
Mufti Yasir ne bilkul clear stance liya: agar koi Muslim bhi church par attack karta hai, to uska Islam se koi taalluq nahi. Islam non-Muslim places of worship ki hurmat ka sabse bada daai hai – chahe wo church ho, synagogue ho ya mandir ho. Jo aisa zulm karta hai, wo apne aap ko expose karta hai, Islam ko nahi.
DETAILED ANSWER – Pakistan aur India ke incidents aur Islamic hukm
Mufti Yasir ne do situations ko compare kiya:
- India: Manipur me churches ko jala diya gaya, women par zulm hua, lekin government ne timely action nahi liya. 2 mahine tak silence tha. Babri Masjid ka demolition bhi ab tak unresolved hai.
- Pakistan: Wahaan bhi kuch logon ne churches ko damage kiya, lekin un par terrorism laws ke under action hua, unko arrest kiya gaya – aur yeh ek positive step tha.
Unhone ye bhi bataya ke Islam ka asal stance kya hai: Hazrat Umar ibn Khattab ka ELIA (Jerusalem) ka letter quote kiya gaya jisme explicitly churches, crosses, aur Christian property ke protection ka hukum diya gaya. Yeh Islamic hukumat ki zimmedari thi, aur aaj bhi hai.
Rasool ﷺ ki aakhri wasiyat bhi non-Muslim citizens ke rights se mutaliq thi: “Unka haqq wahi hai jo Muslims ka hai, unki zimmedari wahi hai jo Muslims ki hai.” Agar kisi Christian ka church protect nahi ho raha, to uska jawab deh pehle Muslim state aur community hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Is objection me kya logical galtiyan thi?
- 1. Guilt by association: Sirf is liye ke attackers Muslim naam rakhte hain, Islam ko blame nahi kiya ja sakta.
- 2. State vs Religion confusion: Political state ki failure ko religious doctrine se confuse karna logical flaw hai.
- 3. False moral equivalence: India me action na lena aur Pakistan me anti-terror laws lagana – dono ko same treat karna unfair comparison hai.
- 4. Ignoring Islamic history: Hazrat Umar ka documented hukm aur Prophet ﷺ ki wasiyat dikhata hai ke Islam ka stance non-Muslims ke rights ke favour me hai.
- 5. Double standard accusation reversed: Mufti Yasir ne Pakistan me Muslim attackers ko bhi openly condemn kiya – bina political bias ke.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Islam ka asliyat se taalluq zulm se nahi
Islam ka record clear hai: masjid ho ya church, har ibadatgah ki hurmat hai. Jo log Islam ke naam pe zulm karte hain, wo usi deen ke khilaf khade hote hain jisme Prophet ﷺ ne apni aakhri saans tak minorities ke rights ki hifazat ki wasiyat ki. Mufti Yasir ne kisi mulk ko blindly defend nahi kiya – unhone insaaf ka standard maintain rakha, aur har taraf ke zulm ko expose kiya.
