OBJECTION EXPLAINED – “Agar Quran Preserve Hai To Uski Original Copy Kahan Hai?”
Ek ex-Muslim ne objection uthaya ke agar Quran waqai Allah ka kalam hai, to phir Hazrat Usman (RA) ke zamanay ki original Qurani copies aaj kyu nahi milti? Usne yeh bhi kaha ke na to kisi earthquake ka record hai, na kisi invasion ka — to phir 7–10 original copies kahan gayi? Kya yeh sab Quran ki preservation ko doubt me nahi daalta?
SHORT ANSWER – Quran Ki Hifazat Sirf Likhi Hui Copy Se Nahi Hui Thi
Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya ke Quran ki asli hifazat writing se nahi, oral tradition (yaad karne ki riwayat) se hui hai. Jo likhi hui copies Usman (RA) ne bheji thi, wo secondary thi — asal method tha hifz aur tilawat ka silsila, jo aaj tak uninterrupted chalta aa raha hai.
DETAILED ANSWER – Quran Ke Preservation Ka Asal Tareeqa Kya Tha?
Mufti Yasir ne bataya ke Quran ke baare me Islam ka claim yeh kabhi nahi tha ke sirf likhi hui kitab preserve hogi. Primary method hifz (memorization) tha. Har zamanay me har shehar me aise hazaron log hain jo Quran ko puri tarah yaad rakhte hain.
Hazrat Usman (RA) ne jab Qurani copies mukhtalif jagahon par bheji, to unke saath 2-2 qari (reciters/teachers) bhi bheje. Yeh is baat ka proof tha ke unka trust sirf likhne par nahi, recitation aur teaching par tha. Agar sirf book preserve karni hoti to teachers bhejne ki zarurat nahi thi.
Mufti Yasir ne yeh bhi kaha ke agar original copy mil bhi jaye, to hamara claim strong nahi hoga — kyunki Quran ki preservation ka base manuscript nahi, logon ka yaad rakhna hai. Is oral chain ka proof aaj bhi har sheher ke madraso me milta hai, jahan har saal hazaron hafiz tayar hote hain.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Yeh Argument Kyu Galat Hai?
1. False Assumption: Written = Only Valid Preservation
Objector yeh samajh raha hai ke sirf likhi hui kitab hi valid preservation hoti hai, jabke Islam ka system oral + written dono tha, jisme oral primary tha.
2. Ignoring Oral Tradition
Har waqt hazaron log Quran yaad karte rahe — yeh continuous chain kisi aur scripture me nahi milti. Isay ignore karna intellectually dishonest hai.
3. Misunderstanding Usman’s Intent
Hazrat Usman (RA) ne Quran ko standardize kiya, invent nahi kiya. Standardization ka matlab tha script ko unify karna, content ko nahi banana.
4. Teacher ke Saath Copy Bhejna
Agar sirf likhi hui kitab hi kaafi hoti to teacher ki zarurat nahi hoti. Yeh prove karta hai ke preservation ka asal mechanism hifz aur tilawat tha.
5. Carbon Dating Evidence
UK me Birmingham manuscript aur Tashkent ke nuskhe ka analysis batata hai ke yeh sab Rasool ﷺ ke waqt ke ya uske aas-paas ke hain, aur Hijazi script me likhe gaye.
6. Logical Contradiction
Objector khud modern science me “inductive logic” follow karta hai, lekin Quran me jab hundreds of accurate manuscripts milte hain, to wo use reject kar deta hai. Yeh double standard hai.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Kitab Nahi, Insaan Quran Ko Bacha Rahe Hain
Quran ka preservation ek zinda tradition hai. Har saal naye hafiz bante hain. Har waqt duniya ke har kone me log usay yaad kar rahe hain. Jab tak zaban aur log zinda hain, Quran preserved rahega — yeh Allah ka wada hai. Original copy dikhane ki zarurat tab hoti jab Quran zabani aur practical zindagi se gayab hota. Islam ne Quran ko zinda logon ke zariye mehfooz rakha hai, lifafa nahi — content bachaaya gaya hai.
