OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Buddhism ne violence aur slavery se bachne ka behtar rasta dikhaya?
Ek Buddhist objector ne claim kiya ke Prophet Muhammad ﷺ ne slavery, war, aur violence ko promote kiya jabke Buddha ne peace, ahimsa (non-violence), aur mukti ka rasta dikhaya. Usne kaha ke Islam me Allah punish karta hai, jabke Buddhism me sab kuch inner peace aur free will par based hai. Uske mutabiq Islam fear-based system hai, jabke Buddhism love-based hai.
SHORT ANSWER – Buddhism ka peace concept theory me achha hai, reality me fail hai
Mufti Yasir ne dikhaya ke agar violence absolute bura hota, to Buddhist countries sabse peaceful hoti — lekin Burma, Sri Lanka, Japan sab jagah Buddhist violence documented hai. Agar aap ideal system banane chale ho, lekin us system ke followers hi violent hain, to system ideal kaise ho sakta hai?
DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir ne Buddhist contradiction expose kiya
(H2) DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir ne Buddhist contradiction expose kiya
Mufti Yasir ne rational dialogue ke zariye point out kiya ke:
- Agar aap violent nahi banna chahte, to aapko apni society ko defend karne ka haq nahi hoga.
- Agar aapke saamne koi violent society attack kar rahi ho, to aap ya to maroge ya fir fight karoge — aur fight ka matlab violence hai.
- Buddha ke 2500 saal baad bhi world peace achieve nahi hua, balki Buddhist states khud violent ban chuki hain. Burma (Rohingya genocide), Sri Lanka (civil war), aur Japan (WWII) ke examples is contradiction ko highlight karte hain.
Mufti Yasir ne yeh bhi kaha ke agar Islam ne kisi par attack kiya to wo hamesha justified tha — ya to self-defense me ya phir proactive defense me. Islam ka aim sirf protection nahi, balki truth ko preserve karna bhi hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Buddhism ke argument me logical contradictions
1. Idealism vs Reality ka gap
Jo philosophy ground pe kaam hi nahi karti, wo practical kaise ho sakti hai?
2. Peaceful followers ka violent record
Burmese monks ne Muslims ka qatl kiya — kya ye non-violence hai?
3. Violence as absolute wrong
Har society ko self-defense ka haq hota hai — even Buddhist society ko.
4. Selective objection on Islam
Islamic wars hamesha defensive ya strategic rahe. Blanket judgment misleading hai.
5. Fear-based criticism flawed
Agar punishment system wrong hota to har court, every jail flawed hoti — Islam ka justice system regulated aur moral hai.
6. Buddhist detachment hypocrisy
Materialism reject karna easy hai jab tak aapke enemies aapki society ko destroy na karen — jab aisa hota hai to Buddhist states bhi military banati hain.
7. Nirvana without responsibility
If the goal is detachment from life, then duty, justice, aur resistance ka kya hoga? Buddhism me real-world responsibility missing hai.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Peace ka matlab helplessness nahi hota
Peace sirf tab valuable hai jab uski hifazat ki ja sake. Mufti Yasir ne point out kiya ke Islam me peace aur justice dono hain — lekin agar society pe attack ho to uska jawab dena bhi farz hai. Buddhism ka “ignore the world” model real life me kaam nahi karta. Islam ne insani dignity, justice aur truth ki raksha ke liye violence ko ek legal, regulated tool banaya — na ke chaos ka zariya.
