OBJECTION EXPLAINED – “Ek hi kapda? Aur Aysha (RA) ko UTI?” – Objection ka background
Ex-Muslim ne objection uthaya ke Bukhari Hadith no. 312 me likha hai ke Hazrat Ayesha (RA) ek hi kapde me rehti thi, jisme kabhi kabhi khoon lag jata. Fir is Hadith ko le kar usne Prophet Muhammad ﷺ par attack kiya, poocha ke agar uss zamane me kapdon ki kami thi, to Nabi ﷺ ne multiple nikah kyun kiye? Usne is Hadith ko ganda aur medical disease (UTI) se jod kar deliberately distort kiya. Iske sath sath, apne purkhon ke dead bodies ko “Medical College” donate karne wali story bhi add ki, jise Mufti Yasir ne logically dismantle kiya.
SHORT ANSWER – Bukhari 312 aur UTI objection ka short jawab
Mufti Yasir ne explain kiya ke Hadith 312 me koi disease (UTI) ka zikr hi nahi hai. Ye Hadith menstruation ke natural process aur us waqt ke daily life hygiene ka zikar karti hai. Ex-Muslim ne is Hadith ka matlab twist kiya, jisme na ilm tha, na haya. Aur jab usse UTI ka full form tak nahi pata tha, to uski medical authority khud exposed ho gayi.
DETAILED ANSWER – Bukhari 312, UTI aur ‘one cloth’ ka logical jawab
- Bukhari 312 me likha hai ke Hazrat Ayesha (RA) ek hi kapde me hoti thi. Agar us kapde me kabhi menstrual blood lagta, to wo usay apne saliva se saaf kar leti thi.
- Is Hadith ka context poverty aur hygiene se related hai, not medical disease.
- Jo log is Hadith ko le kar UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) ki baat karte hain, wo ya to intentionally confuse kar rahe hain ya unhe basic difference bhi nahi pata between menstruation and infection.
- Jab ex-Muslim se poocha gaya “UTI ka full form kya hai?” — to uska jawab tak nahi aaya. Ye dikhata hai ke objection sirf propaganda tha.
- Mufti Yasir ne ye bhi highlight kiya ke objection scientific ya theological nahi, balki sirf insult-based tha — jiska koi ilm se lena dena nahi.
- Aur jab yeh ex-Muslim ye keh kar debate karta hai ke “humare dada-dadi ki dead body medical college ko donate ki gayi thi,” to iska Islam se ya Hadith se kya ta’alluq?
OBJECTION FLAWS – 6 major fallacies in UTI & one-cloth argument
1. Medical Misunderstanding
UTI ka Hadith me koi zikar nahi hai. Menstruation ko infection se confuse karna basic ignorance hai.
2. Arabic Misrepresentation
Hadith ke lafzon ka galat tarjuma karke apne matlab nikaalne ki koshish — intentional distortion.
3. One Cloth = Poverty, not Shame
Ek kapda us waqt ki simplicity aur modesty ka saboot hai — objection is based on modern luxury bias.
4. Logical Inconsistency
Ek taraf aap religion reject karte ho, dusri taraf usi ki sacred texts ko attack karne ke liye references uthate ho.
5. Character Assassination Fallacy
Prophet ﷺ ki shaan me ghalat medical analogy use karke character par hamla karna — yeh ilm nahi, nafrat hai.
6. Self-Defeating Argument
Jo banda UTI ka full form nahi jaanta, wo medical logic ke naam par Hadith refute kar raha hai — khud hi exposed ho gaya.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Jab Jahl aur Nafrat mil jayein, to is tarah ke objections nikalte hain
Mufti Yasir ne is objection ko sirf ilmi jawab nahi diya, balke uske nafrat bhare irade, jahalat, aur pseudo-intellectual attitude ko expose kiya. Jab koi Islam se door jaata hai, to uska level aise childish aur insulting objections tak gir jaata hai. Ye post sirf ek Hadith ka jawab nahi — ye ek mindset ka postmortem hai.
