Kya Sirf Isliye Sach Sahi Hai Kyunke Wo Purana Hai?

Objection Explained
Ek Sanatani ne yeh argument diya ke Hindutva ya unka culture 10,000 saal purana hai, aur is wajah se usme wapas aana “pride” ka sabab hona chahiye. Unka kehna tha ke agar kisi Muslim ke purvaj Hindu the, aur wo Hinduism me wapas aata hai, to ye ek proud moment hai — kyunki unka asli culture wahi tha. Is logic me “old is gold” ka fallacy chhupa hua tha.

Kya Har Purani Cheez Sahi Hoti Hai? – SHORT me Jawab

Short Answer
Mufti Yasir ne jawab diya ke purani cheez ka hona uske sach hone ki daleel nahi hoti. Agar sirf purana hone se koi cheez haq ban jaye, to duniya ki kai expired cheezen hamesha ke liye chalni chahiye thi. Haq hamesha universal hota hai — na ke regional ya ancestral.

Mufti Yasir Ka Jawaab – Culture vs Truth Ka Clear Farq

Detailed Answer
Mufti Yasir ne is argument ko teen angles se debunk kiya:

1. Universal Truth vs Regional Culture
   Agar aap ye kehte hain ke aapka culture 10,000 saal purana hai, to aapne usko universal nahi banaya — balki sirf ek region tak restrict kar diya. Haq to har zaman, har makaan ke liye hota hai. Sachaai America, India, Japan sab jagah ke liye hoti hai.
2. Old ≠ Always Right
   Unhone examples diye ke duniya me jitni bhi civilizations thi — Egyptian, Roman, Greek — sab khatam ho gayi. Agar sirf “old” hone se haq sabit hota, to yeh sab kabhi nahi mit’ti.
3. Conversion Par “Pride” Ka Illogical Standard
   Agar aap keh rahe ho ke Hindu se Muslim banne wale ko wapas Hindu hone pe “fakhr” mehsoos karna chahiye, to iska matlab yeh hua ke aap purane faisle ko galat keh rahe ho. Agar wo faisla theek tha, to wapas jaake “pride” mehsoos kyu? Aur agar wo galat tha, to pehle kyun nahi samjha?
4. Religion ≠ Culture
   Culture aur religion do alag cheezein hain. Culture insaan banata hai, aur wo waqt ke sath badalta hai. Religion wahy par mabni hota hai — wo universal hota hai, jaise Islam.

Is Argument Me Kya Kya Logical Ghalatiyan Hain

Objection Flaws

1. Old is Gold Fallacy
   Purani cheez ka hona uske sach hone ki daleel nahi hoti. Behtar naya cheez, purane se behtar ho sakti hai.
2. Universal Truth Ko Regional Karna
   Islam ka paigham universal hai. Usse restrict karna keval ek geography ke liye, haq ko limit karna hai.
3. Historical Contradictions
   Objector ne khud kaha ke pehle Muslims ke saath “invasion” hua — lekin jab Mufti Yasir ne Kerala ki peaceful history batayi, to contradiction expose ho gaya.
4. Pride in Reverting = Disrespect to Past Choice
   Kisi ka revert hona “fakhr” sirf tab ban sakta hai jab pehle ka decision galat ho. To agar Islam theek nahi tha, to 1300 saal tak us par log kyun rahe?
5. Religion vs Culture Confusion
   Roti banana, kapde pehnana culture ho sakta hai — lekin Akhirat, Tawheed, Risalat ye religion ke core aspects hain. Inko mix karna confusion hai.
6. Lack of Source-Based Argument
   Objector ne apni baat ke liye na koi kitaab ka naam diya, na source bataya. Bas “maanta hoon” ya “sun rakha hai” kehna ilm nahi hota.

Haq Waqt Aur Jagah Ka Mohtaj Nahi Hota – Final Thoughts

Final Thoughts
Jo sach hota hai, wo na kabhi purane hone se sahi hota hai, na naye hone se galat. Islam ka paighaam wahi hai jo har nabi ka tha: ek Allah ki ibadat karo, Rasoolon par imaan lao, aur Akhirat ka yaqeen rakho. Ye paighaam kabhi purana nahi hota, aur kisi ek race ya region tak mehdood nahi hota. Agar aaj bhi koi Hindu ya Christian Islam accept karta hai, to wo “past ko reject” nahi, balke truth ko accept karta hai. Aur ye haq har insaan ka hai — bina kisi shame ya pressure ke.