OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Moon ke do tukde hone ka koi scientific proof hai?
Ek objector ne question uthaya ke Surah Qamar (54:1) me likha hai ke “Chand phat gaya,” lekin is baat ka koi scientific proof kyun nahi hai? Usne NASA, ISRO aur European Space Agencies ka reference diya aur poocha ke agar ye itna bada incident tha to ab tak koi scientific agency ne uska evidence kyun nahi diya? Kya Quran ka ye claim bas ek story hai?
SHORT ANSWER – Moon split ka scientific proof zaruri kyun nahi?
Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya ke “Moon split” ek metaphysical event tha, jo science ke framework me aana zaruri nahi. Science sirf physical cheezon ko study karti hai, jabke miracles metaphysical hote hain. Har cheez ka scientific proof hona zaruri nahi hota, jaise self-awareness, pain ya hunger – inka bhi koi lab-based scientific proof nahi hota, lekin hum unhe deny nahi karte.
DETAILED ANSWER – Metaphysical miracles aur science ki limitations
Mufti Yasir ne explain kiya ke science ka scope limited hota hai – wo sirf observable aur repeatable cheezon ko samajh sakti hai. Lekin miracles, including moon split, metaphysical hote hain, jinhe na replicate kiya ja sakta hai aur na unka experiment ho sakta hai.
Jaise hum hunger ya apne wajood ko directly lab me prove nahi karte, waise hi kuch realities sirf “intuitive” hoti hain. “I think therefore I am” jese statements ko bhi hum science se prove nahi karte – ye sirf logical ya intuitive understanding hoti hai. Isi tarah, moon split ka event bhi ek spiritual, divine intervention tha jo Prophet Muhammad ﷺ ke zamane me hua – aur us waqt kai logon ne usse dekha.
Science agar kisi cheez ka proof na de to iska matlab ye nahi ke wo cheez exist nahi karti. For example, NASA ne ab tak officially ye declare nahi kiya ke moon kabhi split hua ya nahi hua – lekin wo ye bhi nahi kehte ke ye impossible hai. In fact, stars aur celestial bodies me split and shrinkage ek common process hai, to theoretically moon split impossible bhi nahi.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Is objection me kya logical galtiyan thi?
- 1. Science-worship fallacy: Objector sirf wahi cheez maanne ko tayyar hai jo science prove kare, lekin science ka scope limited hai. Science metaphysics ko cover nahi karti.
- 2. False standard of proof: Har truth ko scientific evidence ke scale par tolna galat hai. Hunger, self-awareness, emotions – in sabka koi lab test nahi, phir bhi hum maante hain.
- 3. Selective skepticism: Objector Islamic belief ke liye proof maangta hai, lekin jab unhi ke religion me “mountains with wings” jese claims hote hain to unke liye scientific proof nahi maangta.
- 4. Ignorance of science’s scope: Science sirf natural, physical laws explain karti hai. Miracles unka domain hi nahi hain, to unka “scientific proof” expect karna galti hai.
- 5. Contradictory position: Objector kehte hain ke split of the moon impossible hai, lekin NASA abhi tak isko deny bhi nahi karta – iska matlab wo khud uncertain hain.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Kya har sach cheez lab me prove hoti hai?
Moon ka split ek miracle tha – aisi cheez jo Allah ne apni qudrat se dikhayi. Science ka kaam hai physical world ko samajhna, lekin har reality physical nahi hoti. Aap apni bhook, apne wajood, apne dukh ko bina kisi lab ke feel karte ho. Har cheez ko microscope me daal kar prove karna zaruri nahi. Moon split bhi ek divine sign tha – jo un logon ke liye tha jo dekhna chahte the. Jo nahi dekhna chahte, unke liye to chand bhi phat kar kuch nahi keh sakta.
