OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Islam Aur Sexual Exploitation Ka Kya Taluq Hai?
Atheist aur ex-Muslim circles me aksar yeh objection uthaya jata hai ke:
“Islam ne slave women ke saath sexual exploitation ko allow kiya, unhe becha gaya, use kiya gaya, aur phir chhod diya gaya.”
Unka kehna hai ke yeh ek exploitation cycle thi jisme slave women ka misuse hota tha – aur is cycle ko Islam ne allegedly “halal” banaya. Is objection me morality, consent, aur human dignity jaise topics shamil hote hain.
SHORT ANSWER – Kya Islam Ne Slave Women Ko Sirf Sexual Use Ka Zariya Banaya?
Nahi. Islam ne kabhi bhi slave women ko sexual object banane ki permission nahi di. Jo slavery system Islam me allow hua tha, wo saza, war consequence, aur ownership transfer ke liye tha – sirf sexual gratification ke liye nahi. Consent aur dignity Islamic framework ka hissa hain, aur exploitation ko justify nahi kiya gaya.
DETAILED ANSWER – MUFTI YASIR KA SHARH-O-TAFSIL WALA JAWAB
Mufti Yasir ne clear kiya:
1. Slavery Islam me “punishment-based” institution tha
Islam ne slavery ko encouraged nahi kiya — regulated kiya. Slaves mostly war captives hote the, aur yeh system ek temporary corrective framework tha, not a tool for lust.
2. Sex as a purpose ≠ Sexual exploitation
Jaise nikah me bhi ek maksad sexual relation hota hai, lekin agar ek aurat slave ban chuki hai (war context me), to uske sath sexual relation owner ka haq ban jata hai — with regulation, with responsibility, not random lust.
3. Selling ≠ Exploiting
Agar koi owner bad-akhlaaq ho, aur slave woman ko abuse karta ho, to Islam ne ownership transfer (i.e., selling) ki flexibility is liye di — taake behtar environment mil sake. Har sale exploitation nahi hoti — jaise company me employee ka transfer bhi ownership rights ka part hota hai.
4. Consent discussion pehle se addressed hai
Consent ka jo masla uthaya jata hai, uska jawab pehle streams me diya gaya tha. War-based slavery ek saza-based model hai, not romantic choice-based relation. Isme modern-day sexual consent framework directly apply nahi hota.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Slavery Aur Sexual Use Ko Islam Se Jodhne Wale 6 Logical Fallacies
1. Presentism Fallacy
Aaj ke Western standards ko past ke war-prison systems par apply karna — historically flawed comparison.
2. Misdefinition of Exploitation
Har sexual relation jo slave ke sath ho, usko “exploitation” kehna — bina context ke judgement hai.
3. Intent Projection Error
Assume kar lena ke slave woman ko lena sirf lust ke liye hota tha — jabke Islam ne slaves ko free karna ibadat banaya hai.
4. Ownership ≠ Objectification
Islam me slave ka maalik hona usko jaanwar nahi banata — uska khana, kapda, shelter, dignity maintain karna maalik ki zimmedari hoti hai.
5. Selective Morality
Western society me pornography, trafficking, aur casual sexual use normalize hai — phir bhi Islam pe moral lecture diya jata hai?
6. Fake Source Bias
Jonathan Brown jese unreliable sources ka reference dekar Islamic tradition ko distort karna — jabke traditional scholars ne clear jawab diya hota hai.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Justice Ke Naam Par Hypocrisy Mat Karo
Agar sexual dignity ka defense karna hai, to pehle apne culture ke OnlyFans, hookup culture, aur porn industry ko dekho. Islam ne har shakhs ko dignity aur structure diya — chahe wo slave ho ya free. Islam ka slavery model temporary tha, structured tha, aur mercy-driven tha — exploitative nahi.
Modern world jahan women ka body ek commercial product ban gaya hai, wahan Islam par ungli uthana — ultimate hypocrisy hai.
