OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Kya Morality ke liye Religion Zaroori Hai?
Ek agnostic ne objection uthaya ke agar ek insaan Palestine me zulm ke khilaaf khada ho sakta hai bina Muslim hue, to kya religion ke bina bhi morality exist kar sakti hai? Uska kehna tha ke humans naturally moral beings hote hain, aur morality ke liye Allah ya religion ki zarurat nahi hai.
SHORT ANSWER – Insaan me moral feelings ho sakti hain, lekin objective morality ke liye religion hi base hai
Mufti Yasir ne explain kiya ke insaan ke andar moral soch ho sakti hai, lekin agar har shakhs ki morality alag ho to phir kis base pe justice ya zulm define hoga? Objective morality – yani wo jo sab jagah, sab waqt pe barabar ho – sirf ek higher authority (Allah) se prove hoti hai.
(H2) DETAILED ANSWER – Morality ka base: Aql ya Allah?
- Mufti Yasir ne bataya ke agar aap kahte ho ke Palestine me zulm ho raha hai, to ye judgment tabhi valid hai jab uske opposite camp ko bhi aap galat keh sako.
- Agar morality sirf opinion hoti (subjective), to Israel ka oppression bhi ‘theek’ ho sakta tha unki nazar me.
- Jitne bhi humans hain, sab ‘justice’ ko accha samajhte hain, aur ‘zulm’ ko bura — even Hitler apne kaam ko justice ke taur par justify karta tha.
- Jab poori insaniyat across space and time kisi ek value (justice) par agree karti hai, to iska matlab hai ke wo value koi social agreement nahi — balki ek universal, objective moral hai.
- Aur jab wo objective hai, to uska base insaan ke bahar hona chahiye — wahi base Allah hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Agnostic ke logic me contradictions
Fallacy 1: Mistaking Feeling for Authority Moral feel hona aur moral law ka hona alag cheezein hain. Law tabhi banta hai jab uske peechhe koi authority ho.
Fallacy 2: Denying Objective Morality but Using It Agnostic kehte hain objective morality nahi hai, lekin wohi log ‘Palestine me zulm’ ko universal truth kehke condemn karte hain.
Fallacy 3: Cherry-Picking Morality Kisi ek act ko (jaise slavery) condemn karna aur dusre act ko justify karna bina universal base ke contradiction hai.
Fallacy 4: Ignoring the Source of Law Traffic rules ka logic samajhne ke liye bhi ek higher thinking framework chahiye — wo kaha se aaya?
Fallacy 5: Shifting Definitions of Justice Jab har shakhs justice ki apni definition rakh lega, to justice ka concept hi meaningless ho jayega.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Morality bina Allah ke base-less hai
Mufti Yasir ne sabit kiya ke har insaan ke andar jo morality hoti hai, wo Allah ki taraf se fitrat me daali gayi hai. Lekin jab log Allah ko hata dete hain, to morality sirf ek opinion ban jaati hai — koi universal binding nahi rehti. Agar morality ko objective, binding aur timeless banana hai, to uska source Allah hi ho sakta hai. Warna, jisme taqat hai wahi apni morality thop dega — aur phir na Palestine safe hoga, na duniya insaaf pe chalegi.
