OBJECTION EXPLAINED – Ameer Haq ki baat insult thi ya sirf criticism?
Ek objection uthaya gaya tha ke kya Ameer Haq jaise log sirf “criticism” karte hain ya waqai Islam aur Prophet ﷺ ki tauheen karte hain? Objector ne kaha ke agar Hindu devtaon ke against koi baat kehna insult nahi, sirf criticism hai, to phir Prophet Muhammad ﷺ ke against bhi aisi baat insult nahi honi chahiye. Uska kehna tha ke woh bas ek “logical comparison” kar raha tha — lekin Mufti Yasir ne is argument ki hypocrisy ko expose kiya.
SHORT ANSWER – Tauheen aur Criticism ka farq hota hai
Mufti Yasir ne saaf kaha: agar koi baat tumhare devta ke against insult lagti hai, to wahi baat hamare Nabi ﷺ ke liye bhi insult hogi. Criticism ikhlaaq ke sath ho sakta hai, lekin tauheen (intentional disrespect) kisi bhi system me acceptable nahi. Ameer Haq ne boundaries cross ki aur usko ban karna bilkul justified hai.
DETAILED ANSWER – Mufti Yasir ne hypocrisy expose ki
- Objector ne kaha: “Ram ne Sita se 6 saal ki age me shadi ki” – aur bola ye sirf criticism hai.
- Mufti Yasir ne jawab diya: “Agar main yehi line dusre tone me Prophet ﷺ ke liye bolun to kya aapko bura nahi lagega?”
- Fir objector confused ho gaya, contradiction me phas gaya — aur finally keh diya ke “mujhe bura nahi laga” — lekin jab Ameer Haq ne wahi tone use ki Prophet ﷺ ke liye, to usko bura laga.
Mufti Yasir ne ye bhi clarify kiya ke:
- Har cheez ka kehne ka ek andaaz hota hai.
- Hum non-Muslim devtaon ki insult ko bhi mana karte hain.
- Agar koi hamare platform pe aakar tauheen karega, to use ban karna bilkul usooli faisla hai.
OBJECTION FLAWS – Hypocrisy aur logic flaws exposed
1. Role Reversal ka double standard
Hindu devta par baat criticism, Prophet ﷺ par wahi baat tauheen? Yeh kaisa logic?
2. Moral boundary selective hai
Aap kehte ho “mujhe bura nahi laga,” lekin dusre ki insult par outrage karte ho?
3. Intent hide karna by tone
Tauheen soft tone me bhi tauheen hi rehti hai — niyyat se pehchani jaati hai.
4. Free speech ka misuse
Aap speech ke naam pe insult promote kar rahe ho — isse secular space toxic hota hai.
5. False equivalence
Ram–Sita analogy force karna aur Prophet ﷺ par wohi model apply karna – historically aur logically flawed hai.
6. Repeated behavior = agenda
Ek baar nahi, baar baar same tauheen dobara repeat karna — ye sirf “argument” nahi, deliberate provocation hai.
7. Platform rules = right to ban
Har platform ka ikhlaaqi standard hota hai. Agar koi usse cross kare, to ban karna usool ka hissa hai — censorship nahi.
FINAL THOUGHTS – Freedom of speech ka matlab freedom to insult nahi hota
Mufti Yasir ne clear message diya: agar aap criticism karte ho toh izzat aur daleel ke sath karo. Tauheen karoge, to jawab milega. Ameer Haq ne jis tarah Prophet ﷺ ko target kiya, uska jawab logically, ikhlaaq se aur reason ke sath diya gaya. Lekin koi bhi platform apni boundary protect karne ka haq rakhta hai — aur agar koi red line cross karega, to action lena zaroori hai. This is not suppression. This is responsibility.
