Aaj ke daur me jab science ko har cheez ka final judge samjha ja raha hai, log har moajza par sawaal uthane lagte hain. Magar jab baat unki apni “holy books” ki aati hai, to unhi standards ko bhool jaate hain. Aaj ka maqala isi contradiction par roshni daalta hai — jab Ramayana ki kahani me “mountains with wings” jaise dawe ko ek Hindu caller ne khud jhoot maan liya, to sawal utha: agar ek baat jhooti ho gayi, to kya poori kitaab insanon ki gadhhi hui kahani ban jaati hai?
Is maqale me hum kuch aham aitraazat ka jaiza lenge aur Islam ke moajzaat, khaaskar “moon splitting” ke hawalay se bhi logical aur aqal pasand jawab pesh karenge.
Key Takeaways:
- Agar kisi “sacred text” me aik baat irrational aur jhooti sabit ho jaye, to uske poore status par sawal uthta hai.
- Hindu caller ne khud Ramayana ki story “mountains with wings” ko reject kar diya — is se us kitab ki credibility girti hai.
- Islam ka moajza (moon split) ek metaphysical waqia hai jise science ke scale par measure karna fallacy hai.
- Logical reasoning ke mutabiq, agar ek cheez impossible sabit ho jaye, to uske barabar me khud contradictory stance lena double standard hai.
- Sacred texts ko evaluate karte waqt logical consistency aur epistemological honesty zaroori hai.
Kya Sacred Book Me Galti Ho Sakti Hai?
Objection: Ramayana me likha hai ke pahadon ke par thay aur wo ura kar chalte thay. Kya aisa possible hai?
Caller ne khud yeh iqraar kiya ke yeh baat scientific taur par ghalat hai. Garud jaise urhne wale pahad, jinhe Devtaon ne wajar se unke par kaat diye — yeh ek “sacred” kitab ka hissa batayi gayi kahani hai. Lekin is par koi scientific evidence nahi milta. Agar ek “holy book” me aisi irrational story ho jaye to kya wo sacred reh jati hai?
Agar kisi kitaab ka ek daawa jhoot sabit ho jaye to baaqi daawon ka bhi ehtimaal hota hai ke wo ghalat hon. Yeh Epistemological Skepticism ka basic rule hai — ek dafa credibility toot jaye to har clause shak ke daaire me aa jata hai.
Kya Islam ke Moajzaat bhi Aise hi Fiction hain?
Objection: Agar Ramayana ki kahani galat hai to kya Qur’an me bhi moon splitting jese dawe fiction hain?
Yahan pe aik aham confusion hai — Islam ka moajza “Shaqq al-Qamar” (moon ka do hisson me taqseem hona) ek miracle hai, na ke natural phenomenon. Miracle ka matlab hota hai:
“Aisi cheez jo insan ke normal scientific observation se beyond ho.”
Is ka matlab yeh nahi ke wo impossible hai. Bas yeh ke science ka scale usse naap nahi sakta. Jaise agar koi kahay ke science ne ab tak kisi insani rooh ko nahi pakda, to kya rooh ka hona jhooth sabit ho jata hai?
Science ka kaam physical reality ko samajhna hai. Moajzaat metaphysical hotay hain. Islam yeh claim nahi karta ke moajzaat scientific explanation ke mutabiq hon — balke unka maksad hota hai kisi divine message ko proof karna.
Logical Fallacy: Double Standard Reasoning
Ramayana ke pahadon ke par reject karne ke bawajood bhi agar koi Quran ke moajza par shak kare, to yeh aik fallacy ban jata hai: “Special Pleading.”
Yeh fallacy tab hoti hai jab koi apne beliefs ke liye ek standard use kare (e.g., ‘yeh symbolic hoga’), lekin doosre ke beliefs ko usi standard pe reject kare (e.g., ‘yeh scientific proof nahi hai to jhoot hai’).
Isi tarah, “Tu Quoque” fallacy bhi hoti hai jab koi shakhs kehta hai:
“Agar meri kitab me ek kahani galat hai, to tumhari bhi galat honi chahiye.”
Magar Islam ka claim different hai: Quran me jo moajzaat mention hain, wo kisi personal kahani ke taur par nahi, balki us waqt ke logon ke samne huye waqiaat ke taur par mention hain — aur sabse important, Islam moajzaat ko real aur objective truth ke taur par present karta hai, na ke myth ya symbolism ke taur par.
Moajza aur Science: Aik Bunyadi Farq
Moon split ke aitraaz par jab “scientific evidence” maanga gaya to yeh samajhna zaroori hai ke:
- Science evolving hai, final nahi.
- Moon split ka waqia miracle tha, not repeatable or observable today.
- NASA aur ISRO ki reports me aise fractures ka zikr milta hai jo lunar surface par 12 mile deep cracks ko show karte hain. Yeh direct proof nahi, magar indirect indication hai ke kuch unusual zaroor hua hai.
Science ki apni limitations hoti hain. Har cheez ko lab me prove nahi kiya ja sakta. Agar sirf lab ki chhanni se hi mazhab ka saboot chaha jaye to insaf nahi ho sakta. Yeh bilkul usi tarah hai jaise koi kehta hai:
“Main sirf us cheez ko maanoonga jo microscope ke neeche dikhai de.”
Kya emotions, akhlaqiyat, roohani asraat ko bhi microscope se nap sakte hain?
Kya Aik Galti Poori Kitaab Ko Nakar Deti Hai?
Agar kisi kitaab me ek dafa irrational claim ho jaye, to us kitab ki sacredness pe sawal uth jata hai. Yeh Principle of Internal Consistency ke khilaf hota hai.
Islam ka claim yeh hai ke:
- Qur’an me koi contradiction nahi hai. (Surah Nisa:82)
- Qur’an kisi fictional story telling ka mix nahi, balke Allah ka direct wahi hai.
Agar kisi ko Qur’an ke kisi claim se confusion ho, to Islamic scholarship me uska jawab maujood hai — aur agar wo miracle hai, to usay miracle hi maana jayega, na ke scientific experiment.
Conclusion
Yeh baat sabit ho gayi ke jab kisi shakhs ne Ramayana ke “mountains with wings” jese irrational claim ko reject kiya, to us kitab ka sacred status bhi challenge ho gaya. Doosri taraf Islam ke moajzaat, specially moon splitting, ko logically reject karna bhi ek double standard ban jaata hai — kyunke science ki limitations aur moajzaat ki metaphysical nature ko nazarandaaz karke koi bhi insaf par mabni analysis nahi ho sakta.
Islam logical bhi hai, metaphysical bhi — aur sab se ahem baat, apne stance me consistent bhi.
FAQs
Q: Kya Qur’an ke moajzaat ko science se prove karna zaroori hai?
A: Nahi. Moajza ka matlab hi hota hai ke wo science ke scope se bahar ho. Islam science ko reject nahi karta, lekin moajzaat ko uska tool nahi banata.
Q: Agar kisi kitab me ek galti ho to kya poori kitab reject karni chahiye?
A: Agar wo kitab apne aap ko “divine” kahe aur us me contradiction ho to uska divine status doubt me aa jata hai.
Q: Moon split ka koi scientific proof mila hai?
A: Direct proof nahi, lekin kuch NASA observations me lunar surface par unusual deep cracks paaye gaye hain jo is event ki possibility ko completely rule out nahi karte.
Q: Kya Islam fiction aur myth ki tarah kahaniyan sunata hai?
A: Nahi. Islam har claim ko ya to waahi, ya moajza, ya logical dalil se pesh karta hai — khurafat ya gadhhi hui kahaniyon ki jagah nahi.
